For most of my life I’ve been a disciplined saver. I rarely buy the latest and greatest of any eletronics because they depreciate in value so rapidly. Until this year I used an old fashioned flip phone while my peers were on their fourth generation of smart phones. I had pre-colour display Ipod until recently, because, well it plays music just fine. Hell, half my music collection is on 12” vinyl.
Over this time period, I was smug in my knowledge that I was building a small, but repectable amount of savings [link] while friends were struggling with school debt or working multiple minimum wage jobs to purchase status symbols of ostensibly no real value.
TOO MUCH OF A SAVER?
Recently, however, I haven’t been able to shake the feeling that perhaps I was being too much of a saver. In one of my first posts [link], I questioned what the point of it all was; many blogsphere personalities maintain high savings rates my making extrodinary sacrifices in quality of life. I feel as that defeats the entire purpose of accumulating wealth.
Beyond that, there are times when being too stingy can cost you money. How do I explain this apparent paradox? Well listed below are some of the I now realize I do:
1- Settle for lesser quality: Though I fancy myself a savvy consumer and try to look for the best value, sometimes I fall into the trap of trying to satisfice with the least expensive option. The end result? Not only are you unhappy with what you have, you may have to purchase the higher priced item anyways. You’ve spent additional money, time, and created uncessary waste.
Personally, I’ve done this a lot with clothes. I’ve bought things that were not the best fits, styles or colour because they were cheap and/or heavily discounted. When I cleaned out my closet last year, there were about 10 glad garbage bags worth of stuff that had to be donated because I wasn’t wearing it. In the end, it would have been more cost effective to buy higher priced items and in the process not have embarrassed friends and family in the process.
2- Spending time chasing a deal: It’s well documented that people have loss aversion. Ie: We’re derive multiples more pain from losing money than we gain from winning an equivalent amount. This bias causes people to hold onto their losers and hold their winners too long on the stock market. It also affects my consumer behaviour, Recently, I spent hours trying to find a free alternative to a $25 paid app. Evidently, my time would have been better served elsewhere.
I’m still undecided as to whether letting the little things go, ie: things that that too much time / $ to fix is a good idea. On one hand, it frees up valuable time to pursue other more fun, likely more profitable ventures. On the other hand, it could create a slipperly slope which will lead me to become progressively more indifferent to losing money and hamper my savings ability.
UNQUANTIFIABLE LIFE CHANGERS
Now that we’ve covered the small, obvious ones, here are some more difficult to quanity costs of being frugal.
Getting out there: This one probably took me the longest to realize. Growing up, I knew many wealthy kids who spent more money than my family had. I figured it was too costly to socialize with them so I mainly stuck to a different group of friends.
In retrospect, I now realize how valuable those social ties would have been. Sure I could network, but social ties going back years will always trump newly formed working relationships. These guys go to bat for eachother at every possible opportunity and have influence of their family’s affluence and connections. I have no doubt them will be leaps and bounds more sucessful than I regardless of our relative intelligence or drive.
Studenomics suggests that we’re the average of our 5 closest friends, and that we shouldn’t hang out with big spenders. However, there’s a correlation between earnings power (future or current) and spending in absolute terms. Do I find 5 frugal friends and spend less or 5 high roller friends and earn more?
Perhaps I’m just trying to justify my ridiculous bar tabs, but I’m undecided about where the right balance lies in this.
No Debt MBA is attempting to graduate from a top 5 MBA with no debt. While that would be a fantastic accomplishment, I can’t help but wonder if the sacifice is warranted. Apart from pedigree, the value of an MBA is in the network you acquire. If graduating debt free, requires skipping out on the $5k class journey, are you not missing out on an important bonding experience? After all, the same course material is taught everywhere.
Her strict $25/week grocery budget also precludes her from dining out with her classmates. If college was any indication, the closest bonds I formed were outside the classroom.
This post has been featured as an editors pick! Check out the Carnival of Personal Finance #327 @ Mrs. Nespy’s World.

7 Responses to The Cost of Frugality – When Savings Attempts Cost You Money
Bret @ Hope to Prosper
Replied on: September 19, 2011, 5:52 pm
I think it’s natural to gravitate toward frugailtywhen you have a small income and a tight budget. It’s easier to control spending in the short-term than to increase your income. However, I believe increasing your income over the long-term is much more efficient and effective, especially if you keep a lid on spending.
Gen Y Capitalist
Replied on: September 21, 2011, 5:21 am
That’s a good point Bret; it’s easier to budget in the short-term. However, is the short-term even relevant? Retirement and/or financial freedom are both long-term goals. Short-term fluctuations in wealth could be caused by the market or any number of things.
Carnival of Personal Finance #327
Replied on: September 21, 2011, 3:37 am
[...] Quit Your Day Job…: Athletes are Underpaid… Gen Y Capitalist: The Cost of Frugality – When Savings Attempts Cost You Money The Dividend Guy Blog: Why You Should Not Care About The US Government’s Debt Problems Your Life, [...]
PKamp3
Replied on: September 23, 2011, 1:48 pm
You make a good point when it comes to college. I commented on Bret’s site that I occasionally skipped events due to my lack of funds – there is a reason some people call USC the University of Spoiled Children, haha. However, I made an effort to attend lots of events, and sucked it up and went to others that were a bit pricier. You do have to enjoy the experience even if sitting in your apartment may be cheaper.
And it’s true you can find the same coursework elsewhere, probably even cheaper. I like to think that may not be true for Engineering, but even that isn’t true (http://see.stanford.edu/ , for one).
Gen Y Capitalist
Replied on: September 24, 2011, 12:31 am
I’ve always found that description of USC to be pretty amusing. It’s pretty easy to hold spoiled children from affluent families in low regard, but I think pragmatically it makes much more sense to befriend them.
PKamp3
Replied on: September 24, 2011, 3:48 am
By definition, I’m a spoiled kid as well. Private school straight through to USC. However, my dad drew a line and said “we will pay half”… leaving me to make up the gap with scholarships, loans, and a (at-the-time) lucrative internship in the defense industry.
Some of my good friends had it much better, but I agree the whole spoiled thing is overblown – UCLA was no different. Of course, being a UC comes with the easy out of being a public school (it’s the same price if you come from out of state, like I did).
I guess if the quote is, “Born on third base and acts like he hit a triple”… I was at least born on first.
A side note: We liked to call ourselves the “University of Sexy Chicks”.
Gen Y Capitalist
Replied on: September 24, 2011, 6:45 am
The private / public distinction can be a bit ridiculous. I did private school as well… on financial aid and then paid my paid my through college minus a year of rent.
Most of my public school friends were born were with more and lived in relative luxury for a good chunk of their school days. I can’t help but laugh when friends use the “spoiled rich kid” label on me.
On a side note, the USC party scene looks sick. From what I can tell, it also has an incredible alumni network.